logoalt Hacker News

pstuarttoday at 4:49 PM3 repliesview on HN

I have a dumbed down version of this question as variant of the Voight-Kampff test (Bladerunner) that goes like this.

You have 2 choices for how the world is shaped, pick 1:

A. You have a modest but comfortable home, a job that pays you enough so that you have what you need and can afford occasional luxuries (e.g., an annual holiday abroad), have good health insurance, access to education and childcare, etc. Everybody else has the same thing, and because of this you live in communities where the arts flourish because nobody has to worry about becoming homeless or destitute.

B. You live in magnificent mansion, one of dozens you own around the world (accessible via one of your personal Gulfstream jets). You have more money then you could ever spend in a lifetime (even recklessly). Your homes are staffed with obedient servants who cater to your every desire. I mean anything. You own them. Your mansions are on palatial estates with secure walls and guards to keep out the rabble outside -- who fight for scraps and are desperate enough to do any kind of work to keep your factories humming and printing cash.

I wouldn't hesitate to choose A because that's a world I'd love to live in and the world of B horrifies me. I don't say this as virtue signaling, it's my innate reaction.

I think that a significant portion of the population would love to choose B. And in some ways, some already have.


Replies

ameliustoday at 5:05 PM

I think most people want to earn more the harder they work, and I think that is fine.

However, power laws basically spoil it because it gives a hard worker an exponential advantage, where they can (and will) use that money against other people who made different life choices.

show 3 replies
newfriendtoday at 5:23 PM

You could go do A right now at a local level. You don't though, because you don't actually want to live that way. It reeks of virtue signaling despite your protest.

show 1 reply
achenettoday at 5:48 PM

I really hate to call people stupid, but I would actually go ahead and call people who choose option B idiots.

I'm sorry if that offends anyone reading this, you can downvote me out of spite if that makes you feel better.

I say this because I read a while ago (like years) an article in the Economist showing that happiness in a society is correlated with equality - (sorry for the dash I am a human I just happen to use em dashes sometimes) not just amongst the poor, but also for the rich.

You'll note that rich people in highly unequal societies tend to struggle with mental illness more than in equal societies.

Money doesn't buy happiness. Being filthy rich won't heal the hurt in your heart. If you're too stupid too realize that, that's fine, enjoy your suffering, but I'd appreciate you having the honesty to admit that you're a deluded moron instead of trying to create completely false arguments for why the misery you're creating for yourself and others is actually a sign of anything less than pure human stupidity.

I couldn't find the original Economist article, nor the study it cited, but here's a link I found on Google.

https://leftfootforward.org/2017/03/people-are-happier-in-mo...