logoalt Hacker News

BobbyJotoday at 3:44 PM4 repliesview on HN

Is there anyway to build intelligence that doesn't meet the definition of plagiarism you are using here?

I remember when IP laws were looked at like a form of oppression in the tech community...


Replies

hallway_monitortoday at 4:13 PM

Yes, it is called paying for the use of copyrighted material which people put a lot of time and money into creating. Is this not obvious?

show 1 reply
comfysockstoday at 4:06 PM

To me, the problem is when IP laws are stretched and abused by big corporations (like, say Disney) or by patent trolls. If IP laws could work in a way that gave limited and reasonable protections to actual creators and innovators, then I don’t have a problem with them.

salawattoday at 4:56 PM

It still is oppression. What many of us object to now is how starkly it's revealed the 2 tier illegitimate judicial system that on the one hand ruins grandmas and teenagers, but gives multinationals a free pass for charging everyone to get access to the human corpora. Anna's Archive, while equally illegal in a sense, but at least operates itself in a way compatible with uplifting everyone is getting more backlash than these tech companies that are dead set on "renting out access to intelligence". At this point, if you can't see the absurdity of the System as it functions past the "bing bing wahooness" of AI, I don't know what to tell ya.

Craigheadtoday at 3:58 PM

ahh yes the perfect world fallacy