Nit: there’s nothing “cryptographic” about reproducible builds. “Reproducible build” already usual...

rlt • today at 4:28 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

Nit: there’s nothing “cryptographic” about reproducible builds.

“Reproducible build” already usually implies bit-by-bit reproducibility.

dempedempe • today at 5:56 PM

I meant with Nix you're comparing hashes. With Docker, you're using pinned versions

bt1a • today at 5:07 PM

i thought it mainly implied architectural/hardware compatibility and deterministic output

alt Hacker News