logoalt Hacker News

Green card seekers must leave U.S. to apply, Trump administration says

198 pointsby tlhunteryesterday at 9:27 PM506 commentsview on HN

https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/us-citizenship-...

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/memos/PM-... [pdf]

https://twitter.com/DHSgov/status/2057817233200418837, https://xcancel.com/DHSgov/status/2057817233200418837

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgrpz4l1klgo

https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2026/05/22/new-ru..., https://archive.is/yi2cX


Comments

cyanydeeztoday at 7:35 AM

next headline: trump closes consulates in nonwhite countries

steveBK123today at 2:22 PM

Again worth asking VC Bros if the light touch on their crypto bags was worth all this ethnonationalism?

freediddyyesterday at 8:06 PM

All this means is that I485 is no longer allowed and everyone needs to do Consular processing. It doesn't mean that Green Cards are no longer being processed.

I did consular processing when I got my Green Card. It's the FINAL step fo the GC process. You don't need to be outside the US for all the other stages, in fact I think if you leave during some parts, it would be considered abandoning your application. It just means that while you're in the US, you need to schedule an appointment at the US embassy/consulate in your home country, and fly back. Then you go through the appointment and there on the spot you're approved or rejected. It's a big nerve wracking but unless you lied you will be fine. Then you fly back to the US.

For me CP was much much faster, on the order of months.

show 2 replies
_blktoday at 7:09 AM

This does not seem to target NIWs but rather those who use change of status as a way of extending their stay.

Change of status was never meant for those without status in the first place or for tourists.

I would love be to hear an immigration lawyer's perspective on this.

Here's the memo directly:

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/memos/PM-...

dyauspitrtoday at 12:12 PM

How to destroy the greatest country on earth.

show 6 replies
0xyyesterday at 7:55 PM

This is to close the common loophole where people would fly into the US on an ESTA, B-2 or another temporary visa "without immigration intent" (fraud) and then marry a US Citizen and adjust status.

On visa forums this method is commonly discussed. By entering on an ESTA/B-2 with the intent to marry a US Citizen, they're committing immigration fraud, inherently. You would be denied entry at the border if you admitted to your plans.

The correct way to do this is to file a K-1 visa outside the United States, or marry outside then file a IR-1/CR-1.

show 5 replies
mothballedyesterday at 7:48 PM

This appears to close off the method by which all the "dreamers" I'm familiar with got GC/citizenship, which is by marriage.

show 1 reply
sleepyguytoday at 1:26 AM

So if someone is here in the US on an H1B and they want to become a permanent Resident/ Green Card holder, they will have to go back to their country of origin to apply? Otherwise they just stay on their H1B VISA and work.

Is that right?

show 2 replies
thinkcontexttoday at 12:27 PM

Another immigration policy that would have negatively effected Trump's own wife. Oh well, she got hers.

This could be a big deal for Big Tech. I wonder how personal experience of Musk and Huang will play into how they react.

dyauspitrtoday at 6:29 PM

Step 324 of how to make Russia great again.

ck2today at 1:22 PM

Don't worry, the are letting in white South Africans

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/18/us/politics/trump-afrikan...

the wildly corrupt double-standard is breathtaking

There is well documented historical evidence Elon Musk not only illegally overstayed a student visa, he also illegally worked while on that visa AND did illegal drugs publicly while on that visa

Destroyed USAID murdering millions, highlights the President is in the Epstein Files extensively, then six months later is flying on Air Force One, it's all a cruel joke against humanity

show 2 replies
SilverElfinyesterday at 3:55 PM

That’s crazy. If someone is already living and working here, and is legally here (like on a work visa), why shouldn’t they be allowed to apply here? Why require them to lose time and money by traveling somewhere else?

show 1 reply
busterarmtoday at 4:43 AM

This is such an insanely unpopular move even among some of trump’s supporters. I really think this will be this version of the republican party’s suicide note.

show 2 replies
SV_BubbleTimetoday at 4:10 AM

I was under the impression that this is roughly how it works (assume equivalency) in most European countries is it not?

show 4 replies
pannyyesterday at 6:46 PM

That's how it works for legal immigrants, yes.

show 1 reply
pointertowhereyesterday at 8:21 PM

[dead]

nine_zerostoday at 12:55 PM

[dead]

s03nk3yesterday at 3:47 PM

TBH I think that is fair.

show 2 replies
GuestFAUniversetoday at 12:13 PM

[dead]

booleandilemmatoday at 5:32 AM

[flagged]

vachinatoday at 1:45 PM

[flagged]

show 1 reply
SilverElfintoday at 6:11 AM

So the racists in the Trump administration - my guess is Stephen Miller types - are literally making it so that LEGAL immigrants have to spend thousands of dollars and time to go submit a form in another country, when they can do it here? Or online? Why?

The cruelty is the point. They want the economic benefit of immigrants but also want them to live in uncertainty and without any easy path to settling down. Complete and utterly stupid.

enraged_camelyesterday at 7:40 PM

This is an absurd change that will have catastrophic consequences in both academia and the private sector. Even if you're a US citizen who is "America First", you will feel the impact, and it will be net negative.

show 3 replies
kylehotchkissyesterday at 7:31 PM

This seems like it could have some ramifications.

Let's saying you're dating somebody on a work visa, if you wanted to marry and sponsor their residency, would they now need to return to their home country to wait for the embassy?

The embassies reviewing applications put a LOT of weight on time spent in person, BUT they also require the US applicant to have domicile. So effectively, the only way to proceed is a long-distance marriage that could take years to process a visa for (remember: move abroad, and you could lose the domicile required to sponsor the green card).

So with our shrinking birthrates, our regularly documented & growing "will never marry" population, immigration effectively cut off, what does the future of this country even look like anymore?

show 1 reply
grahamgoochyesterday at 8:02 PM

This is a good thing. Adjustment of status for those within the USA is backlogged- by years for people from certain countries. Going to the home consulate for the final stamp will save years for many people.

F1 and h1 are non-immigrant visa.

American law only allows a person to reside in the country with one Visa type.

The green card is an immigrant visa - and the new visa is issued through an adjustment of status for those inside the USA (backlogged) or by consulates (nearly immediately).

So this is a good thing. It’s easy to get alarmed.

show 3 replies
crazyfingerstoday at 2:12 PM

This thread has a lot of comments that seem to associate labor regulations and concern for the poor underclass, and immigrants themselves, with racism. Effective, but not in the intended way.

techteach00today at 7:19 PM

I support this. The United States is too crowded. I don't want to compete with all these new people for housing. American citizens really need to begin advocating for themselves. For their material interests.

show 4 replies