logoalt Hacker News

Octoth0rpetoday at 12:13 AM3 repliesview on HN

> If it's just unreliability then it might be a hard problem to solve.

It might, but it certainly helps having a ton of them around. Given that they used 42 of them today and 2 failed in some fashion, we'll call that a 1:21 failure rate. On a more typical rocket with say 10 engines (eg falcon 9), there's a good chance they wouldn't have seen the same failure till flight 3.


Replies

avmichtoday at 2:00 AM

> Given that they used 42 of them today

20+10+3=33 on the booster, 3+3=6 on the Ship, total 39.

I remember Elon said they want to add 2 engines to the first stage, but that still would be 41. Where's the 42th supposed to be?

show 1 reply
brianwawoktoday at 12:18 AM

It’s something like up to 6 can fail and it keeps going, seems pretty good. I know they did some stuff like remove a heat tile to get failure feedback, wonder if engine was planned or accidental

show 1 reply