logoalt Hacker News

cyberaxyesterday at 7:42 PM1 replyview on HN

It is. But also not game-changing. And we don't have an infinite number of wildlife preserves that we can throw under the bus.

Arctic development is also expensive, and even the planned projects would have been impractical without already-existing infrastructure.


Replies

lazideyesterday at 7:43 PM

By that definition almost nothing is game changing?

The US is one of the most oil hungry countries on the planet, and even 3 months supply is a quarter. That would definitely move the needle on prices!

show 1 reply