It’s icky to see someone make a moral argument to have something banned, and even worse if they want the government to be the arbiter of morality.
Did we really kill God to have some bloodsuckers in suits tell us what’s right and what’s wrong?
If your argument supports "murder for hire should be legal," then the problem is your argument.
>It’s icky to see someone make a moral argument to have something banned
Which are valid arguments in your opinion?
So I take it you have a problem with laws against murder, fraud, theft, etc.
Aside from the government, who is it that you prefer to do judgment and enforcement?