logoalt Hacker News

jsLavaGoatyesterday at 5:30 PM6 repliesview on HN

Thanks for this post. Unfortunately, you used the wrong word choice here and this question has 13 other answers that have some of the same words but don't really answer your particular question so it has been deleted. Also, if this remains posted, my not-on-point answer will get less views.

There's more than one reason that forum is dead.


Replies

alach11yesterday at 6:34 PM

Everyone loves to say this when the death of Stack Overflow is discussed, but it always was that way. Strict moderation, love it or hate it, was part of the platform. And it could have kept going that way for many more years if not for LLMs 99.9% obviating the need for a coding Q&A forum.

show 13 replies
andomaryesterday at 6:50 PM

Yeah, as I understand it, they wanted to optimize for Google search. This meant having "canonical" answers. This killed the site in the long term. In the short term, it worked wonderfully, and the founders made a (well deserved) killing.

cm2187yesterday at 6:46 PM

Agree. But I asked a couple questions about a year ago and got zero response. It's not just people asking questions who deserted SO, it is also people answering them (probably a chicken and egg problem - reversal of network effects).

show 1 reply
cryptoegorophyyesterday at 6:55 PM

This has been my experience. Glad they got what they finally deserved.

zemyesterday at 6:56 PM

if the mismoderation did not kill stackoverflow, it at the least made people who might otherwise have supported the site feel like nothing of value was lost.

ge96yesterday at 6:30 PM

The SO podcast was fun when it was running