logoalt Hacker News

legitsteryesterday at 10:20 PM2 repliesview on HN

If I'm donating money to fight cancer, and the majority of the money goes to administrative staff, that's inherently a flawed charity. It's exactly what led to the downfall of the Susan G Komen foundation.

There's also a death spiral problem. If donations drop and administrative costs stay the same, that charity's ratings only get worse.

There's a reason most examples of successful non-profit unions all rely on steady streams of government grant funding.


Replies

jp_sctoday at 2:20 AM

Is there any charity (older than five years) where the majority of the money doesn’t go to administrative staff?

show 1 reply
skywhopperyesterday at 10:29 PM

What do you think the core purpose of the Wikipedia Foundation is? Do you think the engineers who write the code and operate the site are “administrative staff”?

show 1 reply