logoalt Hacker News

myself248today at 1:21 PM4 repliesview on HN

> it's intended to be preterminated SFP-to-SFP

I wonder why nobody's making field-terminatable DACs for custom lengths. If you've torn one down, they're not exactly complicated inside.

If they existed, would people buy them?


Replies

Aurornistoday at 3:57 PM

DAC cables use twinax. Properly terminating twinax is not easy. It's not as forgiving as twisted pair going into an RJ45.

DAC cables have a limited length range. It's not like 10GBASE-T where you can run the cable hundreds of feet and then put a connector on exactly where you need it. The cables only work at short distances so it's easy to stock the cable sizes close enough to everyone's needs.

zamadatixtoday at 2:52 PM

I think the only reason RJ45 termination is an (occasional) thing for short patching is you're also in spec to go 100 meters with it so the tools and materials to do so are already commonly in use.

For passive DACs the range of lengths is so low you can just get away with having 2 or 3 different lengths on hand and never need to worry about it. Active DACs start to be too much to bother with again.

Fiber it's possible, but again really only because you can go kilometers with it rather than because people want to make short patch cables themselves.

Filligreetoday at 1:33 PM

Doesn't that reduce to RJ45?

show 1 reply
jeffrallentoday at 1:23 PM

Nope. For production, you want to reduce risk and variation. DACs are already available in about 5 sizes up to the max 7m length, why would you terminate any other size in the field?

show 1 reply