logoalt Hacker News

nh23423fefeyesterday at 3:32 PM2 repliesview on HN

Why are you pretending this argument wasn't addressed in the opinion?


Replies

ceejayozyesterday at 3:34 PM

But it wasn't, really.

> Where a voter is entitled to vote by virtue of being both a resident and as an owner of real property, that voter shall be entitled to only one vote; where a voter is entitled to vote by ownership of two or more parcels of real property, that voter shall be entitled to only one vote.

> Any legal entity other than a natural person entitled to vote, must cast its vote by a duly executed and notarized power of attorney from the legal entity granting the authority to cast its vote to its designated attorney-in-fact… The person casting the ballot for such entity shall be age 18 on or before the date of the election and a citizen of the United States.

That just means I have to give 100 people POAs.

show 2 replies
rithdmcyesterday at 3:44 PM

I didn't see anything about this in the opinion.

It does say that multiple owners of a single property can not have their voting rights apportioned by value, as this would be dilution or would not fit one person/one vote.