> Claude ain't “other people” so I don't think this applies.

Claude didn't make the post or come up with the idea or execute it independently, so not sure how that applies.

If you want to comment on the code quality or the engineering itself, that would be a good critical comment that teaches us something.

> By the way, the guidelines proscribe AI-generated comments, so I don't see why AI-generated posts should be treated differently.

That's your opinion and not the guideline, so again not sure how it applies.

You're free to e-mail [email protected] and suggest, but I'm sure it crossed their mind when they wrote about AI comments so I don't think it's been decided that AI-aided projects are somehow automatically invalidated.

This is a nice demonstration of how AI enables people to build things that just wouldn't have existed before because the hassle was prohibitive. Negativity is still unwarranted here.