logoalt Hacker News

elevationtoday at 4:16 PM8 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

skybriantoday at 4:22 PM

What do you mean? It's not a tax on commercial property.

One effect might be that wealthy non-residents prefer to stay in a hotel when they visit New York? The amount of money being collected as property tax would pay for a very fancy suite.

I imagine there will be luxury hotel conversions.

show 1 reply
vardalabtoday at 4:20 PM

Because it's a tax I think on second properties.

show 1 reply
newaccountman2today at 4:35 PM

You sound like you feel the need to criticize this tax because you want to reflexively attack any idea whereby the rich have to pay their fair share of anything, and thus have strung together a bunch of tokens that seem relevant to you, but actually don't constitute a logical response at all to the issue being discussed.

show 1 reply
malfisttoday at 4:22 PM

Who is the "consumer" in this case?

hiddencosttoday at 4:26 PM

Separate commercial and residential rates? The first $X dollars are not taxed?

We can and have done this.

blitzartoday at 4:18 PM

The elites always promise us trickle down economics, maybe this time it will happen. I wont hold my breath though.

show 3 replies
thatmftoday at 4:21 PM

...of property taxes on second homes valued > $1M?

arbitrary_nametoday at 5:58 PM

what does this even mean?