> "could argue that it has been harmed by the diversion of the funds to a different field. But that argument would likely take so long to sort out in court that all the money would have been spent by then."
So if I steal from someone and spend it fast enough, I wouldn't be responsible anymore and can get away with it? That's how that sounded to me.
Something about it being the banks problem if I owe them a billion
If I understand legal terminology correctly*, this is what a "preliminary injunction" is for.
* eh. I'm not a lawyer.
Yes, that is basically how the justice system works. If you have enough money and lawyers you can avoid practically any consequences.