> Hang on.. proof of concept exploit creation and distribution for zero days is “criminal activity” now?
Publicly publishing an exploit is so obviously First Amendment-protected activity that it’s almost tempting to want a test case.
Those are some very bold legal threats considering their founder is an epstein associate.
> Hang on.. proof of concept exploit creation and distribution for zero days is “criminal activity” now?
Publicly publishing an exploit is so obviously First Amendment-protected activity that it’s almost tempting to want a test case.