If the requirements are self-contradicting while at the same time being non-negotiable their job is to quit.
So we agree on what their job is, but you're saying that if their job becomes impossible, they should quit, and I agree.
Do you think the author of the original article should have quit, rather than tried?
So we agree on what their job is, but you're saying that if their job becomes impossible, they should quit, and I agree.
Do you think the author of the original article should have quit, rather than tried?