At times I feel like these people are naive and may be do not have enough practical industry experience around software development, and then on second thought I realize that they are way smarter and counting on everyone else being naive here. This is a cycle of FOMO and a temporary phase.

Something like MCP is not a one time investment, the API's need to be maintained and updated regularly to be useful. Maintenance work is already a cost factor and no one gets promoted by maintaining anything.

Within organizations, smart carrier oriented folks are picking up this area of work for their personal growth and visibility which comes across as if every company is going for it.

Did you consider that maybe he has different information than you do, and thus he holds a different opinion?

I for one love MCP. It's way faster in my experience than skills / shell. And I like how (with Claude Code) I can setup the MCP in the web interface, use it in the chat and the CLI.

Plus the flow to add an MCP via the browser is achievable to any user.

And one thing I don't understand of skills is this. I have an MCP for my life organisation app that authorizes via OAuth. The flow is fully via the browser so I can use the app session and its stored somewhere in claude.ai. How does authentication work with skills?

Their comment does not sound like an LLM to me, it doesn't have most of the other tells.

Also a dead giveaway: >That's what matters