I feel like everyone pointing out "known Docker vulnerability" is missing the point: the presence of a security hole should not be seen as permission to exploit.
Another security hole would be storing your passwords in a plaintext file on the desktop. Stupid? Yes. But I still would not want my agent to assume permission to access email when it's being blocked by 2FA.
Even in "bypass permissions" mode I expect it to pause and clarify and not behave as a paperclip maximizer.
Not to over use the junior engineer analogy but this is exactly one of those "just because you can do something on a system, doesn't mean you have permission to" moments
> the presence of a security hole should not be seen as permission to exploit
Why not?
I want the agents on my side to exploit whatever they can to help me. The ones on the other side certainly won't be artificially nerfed.