If AI is going to be regulated those regulations should be debated in public and based upon the resulting laws passed by the legislative process and not determined by royal decree.
The previous administration did same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14110
So if we’re going to be rational about it, I think it is better to critique the substance of the EO rather than its mere existence, which is common practice: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/executive-or...
So in that spirit, what do you think of the substance?
The previous administration did same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14110
So if we’re going to be rational about it, I think it is better to critique the substance of the EO rather than its mere existence, which is common practice: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/executive-or...
So in that spirit, what do you think of the substance?