There are few large scale US projects that don’t fall behind schedule so that’s not notable. It is notable that the demand-responsive pricing is so useful you can get 100 MW out of it by paying people for power in critical periods. And it is notable that a wind and solar company is Google’s other way out of this. How interesting.
Sooner or later the need for energy will become crucial. If it comes to war, then the US can build but if it comes to anything short of that, environmental concerns will dominate and probably make things unlikely.
It’s no wonder they want to put datacenters in space, calculating that it’s easier to solve the problems there than to solve the problems here. Though I’m surprised: are there no allied nations where we could put these things? The Trump admin has only been here since 2025 but opposition to these projects has existed locally for years. But universally? I imagine Japan or Korea, countries with less superstition around nuclear reactors, would have been happy to have done this.
They are against them in Japan too:
> I imagine Japan or Korea, countries with less superstition around nuclear reactors--
Public opinion on nuclear power in Japan is not great, particularly after Fukushima. They just don't have a lot of other good options - as it is, the country relies heavily on imported coal and gas.