> Because we don't have a right to a continuing service that requires their labor unless they agreed to it
There are carve-outs in the legislation for this. It's a moot point.
So it's ok for companies to misrepresent their subscription services as a "single-payment" acquisition and pull the brought product away form their customers when they want?
Like what? I read it and don't see workabke carveouts.
So it's ok for companies to misrepresent their subscription services as a "single-payment" acquisition and pull the brought product away form their customers when they want?