Yeah, sure, I'm well aware of that, it was more a reaction to parent saying that specifically the accessibility stuff looks amazing, but seems they haven't even nailed the basics yet, so I'm wondering where the amazing parts are.

With that said, the autocomplete example which parent mentioned, does seem well made. Was just surprising to see such a basic mistake in the documentation for the accessibility stuff, one would think they would take extra care to get it right there, as that's what people (and LLMs...) will read and retain.