logoalt Hacker News

Neywinytoday at 4:37 PM4 repliesview on HN

I think you've missed that all generators have upfront cost. That's why the monetary payoff time for installing solar is non-zero. Versus a backup generator you're paying 2-3x the cost upfront. And yes we know the running cost is almost 0, the maintenance is almost nothing, etc etc, but I could see that argument not holding as much water as we need it to.


Replies

crotetoday at 7:08 PM

Solar also has incredibly low upfront costs: 400W panels are available for less than $100 / each these days.

Retrictoday at 5:20 PM

Loans transfer upfront costs into operating costs, thus making upfront costs largely meaningless for anyone with access to cheap credit.

runtime_terrortoday at 5:09 PM

Are you talking backup generator vs solar for a home?

If so, solar continually supplies power without paying for an input vs a backup generator which is only meant to run infrequently and is costly to run and requires you to pay for inputs and of course maintenance of an ICE.

It's kinda an apples/oranges comparison

foxyvtoday at 5:52 PM

> I think you've missed that all generators have upfront cost.

Why do you say this?

show 1 reply