gp's comment had nothing to do with value of the publication. are you implying it ok for them to do that because value?
And making it hard to cancel is not just "marketing" . There are even laws to prevent that sort of thing.
> And making it hard to cancel is not just "marketing"
Yes, we should be clear on this. It's fraud. What the NYT is engaging in is fraud.
No, I am not implying it is OK for them to do that because I read their paper.