logoalt Hacker News

aeternumyesterday at 11:29 PM2 repliesview on HN

Yes, I think given that misinfo this was probably the right decision by S&P, everyone would be saying I told you so and screaming about providing exit liquidity.

My prediction is that this will overall end up costing index holders money though. They will ultimately get a worse entry price for SpaceX and the other mega IPOs. Only time will tell.


Replies

nothercastletoday at 2:03 AM

They might but changing the rules for a highly controversial company would do more harm in lost trusts than gain for investors.

show 1 reply
JumpCrisscrossyesterday at 11:31 PM

> given that misinfo this was probably the right decision by S&P

The misinformation was almost certainly not taken into account, and it shouldn’t have been.

> everyone would be saying I told you so and screaming

Influencers will scream regardless. It’s what they’re paid to do. The NASDAQ 100 made these changes and is doing just fine.

> will overall end up costing index holders money though. They will ultimately get a worse entry price for SpaceX and the other mega IPOs

There are lots of indices. S&P largely targets those built around mature companies. If you want a total-market index, those exist and tend to rapidly incorporate IPOs.