logoalt Hacker News

benltoday at 3:18 PM5 repliesview on HN

If whole market means whole market, then such investments are exposed to companies who are fairly valued, companies who are massively overvalued, and companies who are massively undervalued, and the whole range in between.

If you want to start picking and choosing which companies are overvalued and which are undervalued, don’t invest in whole market funds. But most people are not good at that!


Replies

u1hcw9nxtoday at 5:16 PM

the problem:

The Nasdaq 100 and FTSE Russell made a rule change that allows SpaceX to enter index without mormal time for price discovery. Most index funds have rebalance day just 5 days after IPO. S&P also made rule change for S&P Total Market Index and Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Index, but left SP500 intact.

Nothing wrong with SpaceX or Anthropic getting into indexes with fair rules, this rule change is pure creed+corruption.

show 3 replies
FuckButtonstoday at 7:01 PM

Laying the blame for the transparent financial manipulation we are observing at the feet of regular people (who are putting their savings into their pension funds, a system that we incentivize because of its pro social outcomes) and saying they should just opt out because they should know better, is at best callous, most people should not have to think about that issue at all.

show 1 reply
nativeittoday at 5:43 PM

Are there really 10-100x undervalued companies listed on indexes that haven’t been noticed?

show 1 reply
nibbleyoutoday at 4:39 PM

I don't understand this logic. Does whole market mean scamming companies too?

show 2 replies
ericdtoday at 3:52 PM

Also, there’s a long history of companies that people yell about being overvalued being the drivers of index returns, because one of the major drivers is growth rate, whereas retail investors tend to look mostly at current state.