The best relationships are all-encompassing.

Writes about a romantic relationship and:

References Steve Jobs in a positive way

References Elon Musk in a positive way

References Ayn Rand in an extremely positive way

Their inevitable breakup is going to be spectacularly dysfunctional and likely play out in an extremely public/online way.

I don't think it wise to retreat into the romantic couple, leaving everything else by the wayside. Your partner might leave you or come to resent the closeness. Then again, "I haven't seen him in months, he has a new girlfriend" was a common complaint back in my youth.

> Men, Where Have You Gone? Please Come Back. So many men have retreated from intimacy, hiding behind firewalls, filters and curated personas, dabbling and scrolling. We miss you.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/20/style/modern-love-men-whe...

> Why Women Are Weary of the Emotional Labor of ‘Mankeeping’ As male social circles shrink, female partners say they have to meet more social and emotional needs.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/28/well/family/mankeeping-de...

> Where Have All My Deep Male Friendships Gone? I have many guy friends. Why don’t we hang out more?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/25/magazine/male-friendships...

Classic new relationship energy. It’s such a wonderful feeling. On top of the world. Everything in life glows. But NRE runs out. The OP is correct: critics will say that one person cannot be all things to another. Any relationship therapist or seasoned polyamorous family will tell you that. That’s because those two groups study relationships more than non-poly people do, so they have a broader perspective.

I hope this continues for as long as possible for OP.

Or maybe I just fell for satire and look like a donkey.

Like true love, I somewhat believe this can exist, but most of the people who talk like this are in a codependent relationship. It's just extremely unlikely that a person you're seeing romantically is also interested in all the other things you've got going on. They should support you in your endeavors in general, but often in the way parents might ("ya winning son"?).

Instead, the best relationship for most people will not be all encompassing. Your partner will love you for you and encourage you, will know what you're up to and keep track, but will also have areas and interests that you aren't into. For me, a lot of my growth has come from the areas where partners are into things I'm not: I don't change to be like them, but through their eyes I learn to see things in new ways (while still liking what I like). It can go too far in the other direction - but for most people having parts of your life your partner is not very involved in is a sign of maturity and strength. A strong relationship is a base from which you can set out into the world on your own terms, free to return to that relationship in the future.

This is nice. Friday demos with your partner is a little weird by my standards but when you’re in love you’re allowed to do weird things. Totally agree with OP, when you find true partnership, you really don’t feel the need to seek validation from other people in your life.

Tangentially related, but look up relationship anarchy. If we'd demolish outdated "standard" labels of our relationships, and normalize to making connections between any 2+ persons without them needing to feel shame or the pressure of internal/external expectations, we'd be a happier society.

Those relationships are the ones who hurt the most when they end.

As someone who’s single: Happy for you, I guess.

I wonder if it’s the author’s first time falling in love

He’s writing satire about AI, no?

This reads more like a love letter than life advice.

As a love letter it's very sweet - you clearly have found something special.

As life advice - I mean, not everyone's ideal relationship is gonna look like this, and that's okay too.

> We met at a used book store, her checking out my massive Ayn Rand purchase and disclosing with a soft smile, "Atlas Shrugged was my favorite book when I was 14 and I re-read it every 2 years since."

I can’t tell if this is satire, and I’m worried that it isn’t. I say that as someone who also doesn’t hate that book.

dude's in love

[dead]

[flagged]

[dead]