> Nobody is suggesting we "replace labor" with LLMs.
I take it you haven't been listening to what the guys at the AI labs have been saying?
Plus that's what the whole article is about. I'm not sure how you could've missed that?
> Plus that's what the whole article is about. I'm not sure how you could've missed that?
Even if code typing goes away, a new breed of engineering will take it's place.
Do you normally listen to quacks? You clearly don't believe them. Why are you even paying any attention to it?
You could replace every software engineer on the planet with a perfect LLM tomorrow and it would not lead to mass unemployment-triggered riots. If you're talking about software engineering specifically, you're not correct. If you're talking about all labor, you're talking about something unrelated to the article.