logoalt Hacker News

ghshephardyesterday at 10:27 PM3 repliesview on HN

See: https://www.axios.com/2023/11/18/how-openai-board-is-structu... for the OpenAI Structure.

1) In order to fund research - this stuff costs 10s of billions of dollars - everyone, from Ilya, to Elon, to Sam - all agreed that they would require a profit-arm to raise money. Nobody was going to sponsor that 10s of billions of dollars to a non-profit.

2) The non profit is still there - and controls the commercial element.


Replies

alpinismeyesterday at 10:35 PM

“Controls”

That will be especially untrue after IPO when shareholders can claim there are fiduciary responsibilities that conflict with the non profit goals.

show 3 replies
JumpCrisscrossyesterday at 11:00 PM

> non profit is still there - and controls the commercial element

The non-profit hasn't controlled squat since they tried and failed to fire Sam Altman.

argeeyesterday at 10:31 PM

> Nobody was going to sponsor that 10s of billions of dollars to a non-profit

How much has MacKenzie Scott donated to non-profits again?

Seems like such a claim is on thin ice.