alt Hacker NewsThey have a silent nerfing system for their models and say so openly. The obvious question is how much it is being used already.
Competitor companies being nerfed?
Non Americans getting worse code?
Punishing and rewarding users to maximize engagement, like online games do affecting victories through matchmaking?
Replies
This send chills down my spine. For now I will not use Fable in my research. The risks of being sabotaged by the model are not worth it.
All of the above, and it hasn't just started now. It's been happening for several years at this point.
I re-subscribed to GPT's "PLUS" plan after ditching Anthropic for lack luster results... one of the first coding tasks I gave it resulted in a progress/thinking message that said something to the effect of (it vanished too quickly to get a screen shot unfortunately):
Evaluating client value
Behind the scenes it is not hard to imagine OpenAI, Anthropic, et al simply minimizing processing for clients - like me - that are hopping from one to another to chase the just released SOTA model.
> Non Americans getting worse code?
This is a scary thought: tailoring quality based on user profile.
$$$$$$: no nerf $$$$: a little nerf $$$: more nerf $$: are you poor? $: be permanent underclass
No big pockets and ask it to review your own codebase for security issues? You hacker. Ban.
Anthropic simply can't be allowed to succeed. This is the most E Corp shit I've seen since I've been alive.