logoalt Hacker News

dyauspitrlast Tuesday at 10:37 PM4 repliesview on HN

It is an access issue. If you could get step by step instructions on how to modify a virus so it kills all people over 6ft you bet your ass there would be people attempting it.


Replies

JumpCrisscrosslast Tuesday at 11:39 PM

> It is an access issue

Column A, Column B. Building a small explosive device isn't hard. Building a million is very difficult, doing it covertly virtually impossible without the resources of a nation-state.

The problem with biologics is the self-assembly and replication machinery comes for "free." So the numpties who might otherwise blow up a trash can [1] now have a real chance of taking out a million people.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_New_York_and_New_Jersey_b...

show 1 reply
schaeferlast Tuesday at 11:57 PM

> ...you bet your ass...

Humorously, whether I choose to participate in this hypothetical or not, I am already betting my ass.

This whole situation feels like the game [1].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_(mind_game)

show 1 reply
debesylalast Tuesday at 11:10 PM

I guess in this theoretical "AI makes weapon" scenario one could use the same AI to make defences too?

// Claude, make antiviral nanobots that defend me from 6ft virus. Make no mistakes.

show 1 reply
sneakyesterday at 2:41 PM

If that were possible, they would already be attempting it with the same level of ability as if they didn’t have access to a text file generator app. It is not about access to the information.

All of this “guardrails” handwringing is nonsense. These things output text. Are you for censorship of a book written by a biotechnology expert that gives out the exact same information?