logoalt Hacker News

keithnztoday at 5:06 AM5 repliesview on HN

The irony of an article that makes a false claim about what Google was found liable for.... and that very few are fact checking it :)

The law they broke was a law protecting personal and business reputation against false statements of fact. Essentially no one can say I might be wrong, check yourself, but X is Y if that claim is essentially defamatory.

This is pretty good, I hope googles approach is to make sure they don't end up making statements of fact like they did and use more appropriate wording like according to X.... with direct disclaimer that they can't verify it. Even better that they look court documents to find any legal ruling and point people to that too.


Replies

rendawtoday at 6:11 AM

What does the article say that differs from what you wrote?

show 1 reply
shevy-javatoday at 6:15 AM

Google is breaking numerous things, so even if the article were incorrect, the underlying issue still remains. It is time to dismantle this Evil monopoly completely.

Also I am not entirely certain your statement is correct - which false claim does the article make exactly?

csomartoday at 5:33 AM

How much does Germany follow case law? If this could set a precedent, it's worth noting that anyone can generate these AI overview responses and they're wrong like 9 times out of 10 only.

show 2 replies
aaron695today at 6:27 AM

[dead]