alt Hacker NewsI think Wikipedia's still considered unreliable, but the question that should be asked is whether the author even read the source in "the number in brackets" to ensure that it's even backed properly.
Just like how people should use AI for research, I guess.
When i comment that i've researched using AI this way, it short circuits the brain of the listener/viewer and suddenly my sources aren't valid.
a bing or google or wiki search to get the primary or secondary sources are okay, but if i use chat.deepseek.com instead, suddenly it isn't okay.