logoalt Hacker News

paulryanrogersyesterday at 9:44 PM5 repliesview on HN

Are cars really the best option? Could other public transit serve the same purpose?

(I was once legally blind, still not a fan of cars myself. Though I understand the appeal when externalities are out of the picture.)


Replies

michaeltyesterday at 10:15 PM

Cars aren't the best option, but you can drop self-driving cars into an existing car-centric society one car at a time, with the car buyers paying for themselves.

Making a car-centric society meaningfully less car-centric requires the enthusiastic support of that society, along with competent political leadership, and probably a fair chunk of taxpayer cash too. Suburbs with huge lots make for long walks to the transit stop - but densifying those suburbs is not easy.

I don't own a car; I travel everywhere by bicycle and public transport - but the public transport I use was all built in the 1850s. Some time between then and now my society reorganised into a form that has a lot of difficulty delivering public transport projects.

show 1 reply
seanmcdirmidtoday at 1:10 AM

In the USA where transit in most cities sucks? Seattle is supposedly one of the best but you can’t get to work downtown most days without being harassed by a fent zombie.

ojgjoetoday at 1:56 AM

Paul Ryan Rogers, You are still clearly blind to reality.

Much of the world requires a car. Maybe someday it won't, but today it absolutely does.

drdaemanyesterday at 10:21 PM

Surely, not until public transit networks covering literally everywhere regular roads can get you.

Public transit is better, but building it outside of dense metro areas to the extent it becomes competitive is probably even more difficult than building a self-driving car.

crubieryesterday at 10:43 PM

Does the Subway arrive at my door?