alt Hacker NewsI feel like using Fable in the name is a mistake, who knows how long that model will be around.
Replies
CobrastanJorji • yesterday at 11:21 PM
I don't think using the name Fable is wrong, but I think a pool of Fables should be called a Grimm, or possibly an Aesop.
➕ show 1 reply
vlovich123 • yesterday at 9:55 PM
It's how they name classes of models, presumably this implies something about the relative quantization / size of model, not about the specific performance. E.g. Fabel 5 will be better than Opus 5, better than Sonnet 5, etc. The 5 is the version number of the particular iteration / training run at this class of model.
➕ show 1 reply
aaronbrethorst • yesterday at 9:51 PM
xda-developers.com vs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O2_Xda
comboy • yesterday at 11:41 PM
But it sounds like FableFool so it has that going for it.
fragmede • today at 12:02 AM
Even if that product disappears, OpenAI will never Anthropic forget it.
You could call it aiproductsexchange.com