I'm pretty much hardline anti-AI and even I would say this is too far. If I read documentation or ask my wife to review something, those people did not write the final product. Perhaps it would be mentioned in a citation, like this person has.

If you merely get feedback from a human, are they now a co-author?

It was written on a computer with a keyboard, so clearly it's 0% human written

Most human editors are not given credit, why would it be any different for an LLM?

If you run spell check on a document is it no longer 100% human written?

Editors (as in, the human kind) are not co-writers either.

Yeah! It was typed into a computer and never even put on paper. How can you say it was written at all?

Further, can anything be "100% human writt even if it uses pen and paper? No of course not! Unless it is created by pricking a finger and put on human vellum, it's only partially human written.

Seriously though - if you want to do stupid purity test games, at least be properly pure about it. This half-assed nonsense is just trite.