logoalt Hacker News

gpmtoday at 4:19 AM6 repliesview on HN

> Do you think that Chinese labs will continue to release open models forever

Yes.

I think the Chinese government either already has, or will soon, grasp that if they train the models that people use they dictate what people believe (at least around the margins where that's malleable), and they will happily throw resources at that.

And simultaneously that the only way they can actually get everyone to use their models is if it's possible for us to run them on our own hardware.

(This isn't exactly a utopian view of the future)


Replies

jychangtoday at 4:45 AM

This is going to age very poorly when the best Chinese labs ALREADY just started not open sourcing their models.

Qwen 3.7 is not open source; previous Qwen versions would have open source releases, but Qwen 3.7 plus does not. The second best Chinese model, Minimax M3, is testing the waters by taking longer and longer between “model release” and open sourcing it. This time, they spent 2 weeks after release before open sourcing it. There’s also a lot of rumors of GLM and Deepseek not open sourcing future models.

It’s pretty obvious that you cannot take Chinese models as open source for granted, they’ll be closed source soon.

show 4 replies
nine_ktoday at 5:06 AM

The US administration restricting the use of US-trained models is one of the best gifts it could make to the Chinese LLM producers, and to the PRC government.

show 1 reply
vintermanntoday at 8:35 AM

There's also the Meta motivation, that even if you don't get the control you would like from releasing a model, it may still be worth it to at least deny others that control. I'm sure that matters even more to China vs. the US than it mattered to Facebook vs. Google.

close04today at 7:22 AM

You don’t need the cutting edge to influence people’s opinion. “Export LLMs” to the rescue.

tw1984today at 4:26 AM

> I think the Chinese government either already has, or will soon, grasp that if they train the models that people use they dictate what people believe (at least around the margins where that's malleable), and they will happily throw resources at that.

that doesn't require the model to be SOTA, it can be just a compact model capable of running on some inexpensive hardware. that is vastly different from SOTA models like Mythos which can potentially disrupt lots of things.

show 1 reply
baqtoday at 9:55 AM

> > Do you think that Chinese labs will continue to release open models forever

> Yes.

holy shit the naivete of HN nowadays.