logoalt Hacker News

internet2000today at 4:41 PM6 repliesview on HN

Attribution isn't the relevant part. Lying about your lab's capabilities is.


Replies

Planktonnetoday at 4:50 PM

That's also something all the AI companies have been doing.

show 2 replies
vips7Ltoday at 6:59 PM

Sounds like the whole AI movement.

themafiatoday at 7:30 PM

It seems to me like the lies are both for the same reason. To capture attention and profits that are not deserved.

outside2344today at 5:31 PM

But the whole game is lying and stealing isn't it?

functionmousetoday at 5:01 PM

leopards ate my face

adrian_btoday at 5:01 PM

I do not see anyone lying.

The model card says:

> Post-trained from Qwen 3.5 397B

The model card also says that they use an inference framework based on "SwiReasoning: Switch-Thinking in Latent and Explicit for Pareto-Superior Reasoning LLMs" by Shi et al.:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05069

So the sources seem properly attributed.

They only claim that what they did to "Qwen 3.5 397B" has improved the LLM, including, as expected, with "strong performance in Portuguese".

show 3 replies