logoalt Hacker News

adriandyesterday at 10:56 PM1 replyview on HN

I think you are correct about the legislative push, because it’s clear that US AI companies can no longer live without it. However, it is not the case that this is Amodei’s fault. His push for regulation was clearly at least partly mitigated by a desire for this precise situation to be avoided! With an appropriate regulatory framework and a transparent, apolitical certification or review process, this kind of situation would not happen. Banning Fable is not “regulation”, it’s capricious retribution, and I believe it is the single most damaging thing that has happened to the US AI industry to date.


Replies

CamperBob2today at 12:06 AM

Banning Fable is not “regulation”, it’s capricious retribution

Yes, and my point is, I can't imagine why Amodei expected anything different to happen.

If he wanted regulation, he should have asked Congress. But instead he waved a red cape in front of Trump.