logoalt Hacker News

mapontoseventhstoday at 1:49 AM2 repliesview on HN

He should not only be ostracized by the community, he should probably face charges. To be charged under the CFAA in America we need only show that he was authorized only to access a certain part of the system and the he exceeded the amount of access granted. He very clearly did that. Users trusted him enough to run his code, and he betrayed that trust to make some political point.

Whether it was via prompt injection or SQL injection is irrelevant. Whether you agree with his politics or not is irrelevant. All that matters is he wasn't authorized to delete code from your system, and he abused the level of access granted to him to do that anyhow.


Replies

byzantinegenetoday at 2:27 AM

technically, he didn't do that. your ai agent decided to follow his instructions when they didn't have to.

show 2 replies
slopinthebagtoday at 2:17 AM

You are probably technically correct, yet I take great satisfaction in the schadenfreude of those who benefit from stolen work seeing the product of said stolen work turned against them. I can’t help but cheer, tbh.