logoalt Hacker News

cube2222today at 11:07 AM2 repliesview on HN

Relatedly, I think it's worth noting that Anthropic models have consistently been top-scoring in BullshitBench[0], in a league of their own, really.

Not affiliated with the bench in any way, but I think it surfaces important differences between the behavior of the models from different labs.

TLDR: The benchmark is measuring pushback in response to nonsensical requests and questions, as opposed to going with it and hallucinating a nonsensical answer.

[0]: https://petergpt.github.io/bullshit-benchmark/viewer/index.v...


Replies

mcintyre1994today at 11:38 AM

TBH this is the main thing that made me start trusting Claude enough to actually find it useful, and I'm surprised other models haven't caught up. I assumed they had and I just wasn't aware because I'm not using them in the same way.

Supermanchotoday at 1:55 PM

> I found my interactions with Fable to be extremely impressive; it made other models, including GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.8, feel small and dumb.

> Anthropic models have consistently been top-scoring in BullshitBench[0]

eyeroll I find that Anthropic models feel big and dumber.

https://www.endorlabs.com/research/ai-code-security-benchmar... puts Fable 5th, which seems about right to me.

I'm interested in code utility and correctness, even if the majority of AI use is not focused on that.

show 1 reply