ai can do some of the reviewing, checking calling and called arguments, even things like crufty shell scripts.
but the higher-level "should you do this?" or "check your design" - could AI do that stuff?
> ai can do some of the reviewing
No way this can backfire.
> checking calling and called arguments
Like a static language compiler already does?
IMO it can, about as well as an entry/mid level dev
I think the question is now "should you care?" And it seems the magnificent, incorruptible thought leaders of our time are all converging on "No"
It's difficult to spot issues from a huge diff. But when a agent finish a task, it remembers what it just went through, where it got stuck, when it got corrected by human, what code make it want to say the F word to the author, that would be a good chance to make the codebase cleaner.