logoalt Hacker News

ameliustoday at 4:27 PM2 repliesview on HN

See also:

https://rits.shanghai.nyu.edu/ai/karpathys-microgpt-on-fpga-...

TL;DR: The CPU implementation was 71x faster than the FPGA.

Note: model has only 4192 parameters.


Replies

hedgehogtoday at 5:24 PM

That post is uninteresting both because they miss the point, and it's not clear a human was even involved to perceive a point to miss. Sure, with an unlimited transistor budget, power budget, and a design clocked at 4GHz fabbed on 5nm one of the best CPU design teams in the world can make a thing that is straight line faster than a one-person project running at 80MHz on a 20 year old 65nm FPGA. Any other answer would be extremely surprising.

Now, there are a bunch of interesting things about this project. Seeing the example of a tiny transformer running on FPGA is informative, and that it was apparently a pretty quick project for one person + robot assistance. Probably some transferable lessons for anyone else doing robo-FPGA development.

https://github.com/fguzman82/gateGPT/tree/main/

cyanydeeztoday at 4:58 PM

yeah, then theres prompt loading too.

but anyone who can fit QWEN-3.6 35B with a sustained ~30 token/s and ~100k context with cache could print money as a hardware vendor.

show 2 replies