logoalt Hacker News

ceejayozyesterday at 5:57 PM2 repliesview on HN

"Additional states (including Arizona, Texas, South Dakota and Oregon) have such laws just for motorists" implies that others do not, correct?


Replies

ibejoebyesterday at 6:05 PM

Correct. Some states have broad stop-and-identify laws. Some have limited stop-and-identify laws.

What we're talking about is more specific than that, and other statutes are implicated.

If you were operating a vehicle and cop pulls up next you and casually asks about your day, then you don't have to identify, because that's a consensual encounter. If he suggests that you rolled through the stop, even if you didn't, then you're subject to things like implied consent that are attached to vehicle operation.

lwansbroughyesterday at 6:01 PM

If a state does not have a law regarding stop and identify, that does not mean they do not have a law about identifying when operating a motor vehicle.