logoalt Hacker News

equinoxnemesistoday at 1:21 PM6 repliesview on HN

Considering they explicitly said they had some photos of yours ("You shared them. We protected them."), this seems like chargeback territory.


Replies

lutrtoday at 1:27 PM

Right?? I mean again, I could have gotten a refund in 48 hours, per the smallprint... But I noticed it about ~3 months too late, while writing about this.

But it's okay. Getting those $5 back would make Photobucket look slightly better in my mind, and I don't want that.

show 3 replies
dkuntz2today at 1:50 PM

100% issue a chargeback

StrLghttoday at 1:37 PM

Fully agree, that's just straight up fraud and it's covered by chargebacks.

dawnerdtoday at 3:05 PM

And for an amount that low it would be automatically approved and cost photobucket a lot more. Only real way to punish companies for doing this is

sneaktoday at 1:44 PM

The ToS is what binds. Good luck getting most card companies to allow you to do a chargeback these days.

I’ve been sold counterfeit or defective merchandise on eBay thrice in the last year. eBay’s guarantees are totally worthless even with evidence, and it was like pulling teeth to get my bank to do a chargeback. In one case they wouldn’t at all.

show 4 replies
luisf_mctoday at 2:24 PM

[flagged]