Git is fit for purpose. That purpose is to host a monorepo, with out a lot of 3rd party dependancies, distributed, patch based.

Thats not how everyone else works.

We're all using package managers to help with massive amounts of 3rd party dependancies (why are you version pinning in any place other than your repo, why arent you pulling updates through your repo and reviewing them)

We're reliant on tools like artifactory to make sure those depedancys dont disappear or are not corrupted.

We use yet other tools to manage our binary files (this tool would fix that).

Github, gittea, gitlab, bitbucket... have all added piles of tooling around git, that are grafted on around its short comings.

> It's crazy to me that nobody has made anything better yet.

Because our entire industry has fallen into the rut of "more tools", of stacking turtles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down ) rather than fixing the real issues that hold us back.

> Although I could start that myself and yet have not.

Because unless your a Google or a Linus, no one is going to look twice at your tool for something that is this important. Im not even sure that epic games has the good will, or trust to launch this.

I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt and take a long hard look at it, but my optimism is tempered. But unless it offers a LOT more than git, the extra overhead (lacking IDE support, deployment changes and all the other tooling in GIT's orbit) it isnt going to be a worth while change.