logoalt Hacker News

wasabi991011today at 6:26 PM5 repliesview on HN

Is there a way to read this without a Twitter account?


Replies

CamperBob2today at 10:04 PM

It kills me how many scientific researchers in various fields still rely on X. Every time they post or read a tweet, they are subsidizing the guy who wants more than anything else -- having already gained everything else -- to put them out of a job.

WithinReasontoday at 7:24 PM

https://xcancel.com/OpenAI/status/2067293746556027376

GPT-5.4 reviewed scientific literature, generated and ranked research proposals, helped design experiments, analyzed results, and proposed follow-up studies.

Human chemists steered the work, selected proposals for testing, and validated the final result.

Maria [AI] tested the idea across 10,080 reactions, and human chemists later validated representative results by hand.

Under the optimized conditions, yields improved for 88% of the boronic acids and 83% of the sulfonamides tested.

Human chemists then repeated 14 representative reactions by hand: 11 showed higher yields, including 8 with a more than twofold improvement.

The full process took about 2.5 months, plus another half month for human chemists to write up the results.

show 1 reply
FigurativeVoidtoday at 6:56 PM

It looks like xcancel doesn't support articles yet. There may be another service?