I had read 80% of the post and loved it. Then I came to see few comments - Saw yours and now having difficulty reading further. That means:

1. AI has gotten better - or eventually most people would like reading AI generated content 2. Author is just using AI to post-process - content is original

Anyway I did love the content.

Yep https://www.pangram.com/history/d3fd8f73-af8a-4cdb-968e-7346...

> Here’s where I get frustrated, and this is the part of the article I’ve rewritten three times.

This was the chaotic evil part.

Since I couldn't be bothered, I had AI read it and tell me the outcome: they did in fact go to online-only bookings, freeing the staff from the phones so they could help customers more.

I always wonder how people can tell. For this particular article, was it the thirty-four occurrences of em dashes with spaces on either side? Something else obvious?

(As a non-native speaker) I didn’t notice that, I love this post and even shared it with my team

Not sure if AI slop, or LI (LinkedIn) slop...