I don't understand what you're trying to imply.
If you're making the point that there are multiple confounding factors to just about any non-trivial problem, then I agree.
No, I'm making the point that the way in which git doesn't fit well into many corporate processes can be interpreted as more of a negative commentary on those processes than on git.
No, I'm making the point that the way in which git doesn't fit well into many corporate processes can be interpreted as more of a negative commentary on those processes than on git.