Ya know, maybe we could just not have robots that sprint. Seems people would be more willing to accept living amongst robots that are slow and that humans could easily over power.
Humans are slower and weaker than much of the megafauna we drove to extinction all over the world.
This is how regulation will look someday.
> maybe we could just not have robots that sprint
That would make it less effective in situations that would be better handled if sprinting was a feature.
Yeah, I keep saying, put them on treads. That's how you'll be able to deliver even to the most unwilling customers.
If you're talking human size bipeds, if they have the required peak torques and speeds on the leg actuators to work at all, they will have the physical ability to sprint. You can think of a Segway to visualize this more easily - the motor on it needs quite a bit of power and speed to overcome a human leaning forward drastically without just falling over, a biped is the same thing with more steps. You need quite a lot of power to even idle stand a biped and a lot of speed to even do tiny corrections. If you want to rely on an ifElse statement or a model policy to not sprint, then you just introduce more likelihood of falling over, which also isn't great around humans. If you truly want to know a robot will not (meaning cannot) sprint, you would need form factors like a worm or centipede.